Newsletter articles: Data4lifesciences

October 26, 2017

In this third newsletter of the UMCs' programme Data4lifesciences, we are highlighting one of the work packages, "Reuse of clinical data for research" coordinated by Prof André Dekker. Also in this newsletter: a report on the vibrant Data4lifesciences event in September providing an overview of the first results of the Data4lifesciences program and an item on where to find the updated work plans on our website. And to put in your agenda: the upcoming annual meeting of Health-RI, the Dutch umbrella infrastructure for personalized medicine and health research.

Personalized medicine: a shared infrastructure is crucial

November 11, 2015 Personalized medicine: a shared infrastructure is crucial

Scientific breakthroughs and technological innovations create opportunities to tailor healthcare to the individual patient. However, it often takes long before innovations translate into personalised medicine in practice. ‘An important obstacle is the lack of an efficient national data infrastructure for biomedical research’, says Dr. Jan-Willem Boiten. He is the programme manager of Data4lifesciences.

Personalised medicine tailors healthcare (i.e., prevention, diagnostics, prognostics, or treatment) to the individual patient based on his or her molecular characteristics. These may be biomarkers such as DNA variations that predict the success of a treatment. But personalised medicine is more than biomarkers. It is often called P4 medicine: personal, preventive, predictive, and participatory. The holy grail of P4 medicine is preventing disease and managing one’s personal health rather than managing disease.


‘P4 medicine is a wonderful prospect, but we still have quite a long way to go before the scientific progress can be applied in clinical practice’, says Jan-Willem Boiten. ‘The technological advances that have made personalised medicine possible have also resulted in an explosive growth of complex research data. And a personalised approach calls for large groups of study subjects. At the same time, there are privacy issues and discussions about data ownership. These data-related challenges ask for collaboration and an adequate infrastructure. That is what the Data4lifesciences programme aims to deliver.’ (Read more about the envisaged infrastructure.)


Data4lifesciences is coordinated by the Netherlands Federation of University Medical Centres (NFU). Jan-Willem Boiten: ‘Programmes such as TralT, BBMRI-NL, Parelsnoer, and DTL have made the first important moves towards better research infrastructures. But the UMCs cannot afford to rely on these programmes alone because their long-term funding is uncertain. We need coordinated action to sustain and expand these founding infrastructures, so that we can guarantee their continuity.’

Additional urgent reasons for adapting the current infrastructure are the upcoming EU privacy regulations, the implementation of new electronic health records, and more stringent requirements for the quality of data management and reusability of data by important research sponsors (e.g., the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research NWO, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development ZonMW, and the Dutch Cancer Society KWF).


Jan-Willem Boiten: ‘Collaboration is the only way forward. An example of our collaborative efforts is the conference Empowering Personalised Medicine and Health Research that was held on 4 November 2015. This conference was an initiative of BBMRI-NL, DTL/ELIXIR-NL, and EATRIS. An impressive list of organisations joined the initiative (e.g., Federa/COREON, FHI, FMS, and NFU) and it was supported by large research funders such as NWO, ZonMW, and KWF.

‘The people involved in Data4lifesciences are really enthusiastic’, says Jan-Willem Boiten. ‘There is broad support for collaboration. This is truly special, because these people are former competitors. And it is a bottom-up initiative, i.e., people from the work floor are actively involved in the programme. The time is right to bridge the gap between technological progress and personalised medicine in clinical practice.’